There are always a large amount of websites on the market that use the word "future" in their domain name, but are they really futurist type websites? It is recommended often by print publishers and editors that the phrase "future" is a great word to used in titles, as it grabs people's attention. But, when people use the word future and then do not give predictions or future accounts, then are they really deceiving the viewer and web-surfer. I believe they are.
Recently, an editor of another of things type website asked me to publish a column, in reviewing the web site I discovered it to be underwhelming on the futuristic side, and more heavy in to the scientific news arena. Indeed, if the magazine is seriously interested in "The Future" then why are the articles about new scientific innovations in the present period or happening today? - asked myself.
www.chatrush.com
raadpleger.nl
https://678-hd.com/
www.naiwaennet.com
It seems like they're seriously interested in scientific discovery that has already happened, not what will maintain the future. That's just boring, more science news, regurgitation, typical human tactic of re-packaging information. I believe they can do better, but are holding themselves back, afraid to create people think, worried that you will get too much from your mainstream, quote "core" number of viewers, which I believe they don't even understand.
Obviously, being an entrepreneur, I know exactly why they take action this way. It is because they wish to generate income and thus sink to a diminished amount of readership, while still pretending to speak about the ongoing future of stuff. Once the editor wished to protect such comments, the indication was that your website was mostly about scientific news.
Yes, I notice that your website is certainly caused by a news site and I ask what does that have related to the ongoing future of stuff? Shouldn't the web site be called NSIN.com or something like this; for New Science Innovation News? If your website is about Science News and is an accumulation everyone else's news, then it is really a copy site of a style that's already being used and not unique. Thus, the content is therefore the exact same, so even if the articles are written more clearly and easier to comprehend, which can be nice, still what's the value to a "science news junky" as you will find not many articles on the site compared making use of their competition?
If they called them selves a news site, then you may have "futurist type columnists" anyway, who might project these scientific news items into the long run or they might keep consitently the "Future Stuff" motif and promote the futurist columnists.
This will be a training to all or any "Futuristic" type websites as a case study. For the long run thinkers to your website and have nothing to show them, they will leave. If you utilize trickery to obtain regular readers there, you're doing a significant disservice to the ongoing future of mankind, by promoting present inventions since the be all end all. Either way, it's unethical to utilize this tactic on future of things type websites.
No comments:
Post a Comment